<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Project Sacramento &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://projectsacramento.com/category/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://projectsacramento.com</link>
	<description>Squeezing every bloody drop of fun out of life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:26:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Christian Right View on Sugar Daddies/Babies</title>
		<link>http://projectsacramento.com/2009/01/21/christian-right-view-on-sugar-daddiesbabies/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=christian-right-view-on-sugar-daddiesbabies</link>
		<comments>http://projectsacramento.com/2009/01/21/christian-right-view-on-sugar-daddiesbabies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectsacramento.com/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taki&#8217;s Magazine has a post written from the Christian Right&#8217;s perspective about the Sugar Daddy/Baby phenomenon. There&#8217;s two basic arguments. First, that this sort of relationship isn&#8217;t new; Sugar Babies were formerly called Mistresses. Second, premarital sex is &#8220;sinful&#8221;, regardless of whether it is paid sex or not.
The first point is true. Men and women [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://projectsacramento.com/2009/01/21/christian-right-view-on-sugar-daddiesbabies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Toxic Wife</title>
		<link>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/12/18/the-toxic-wife/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-toxic-wife</link>
		<comments>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/12/18/the-toxic-wife/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectsacramento.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Telegraph did a great series on the so-called Toxic Wife. This is the Gold Digger who&#8217;s succeeded in her quest and gotten a wealthy man to sign a marriage contract. After that she kicks back to a life of luxury and bitchiness. Apparently, divorce rates for this type are jumping due to the recession. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/12/18/the-toxic-wife/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Rape&#8221; Definition Updated in MD</title>
		<link>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/04/19/rape-definition-updated-in-md/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rape-definition-updated-in-md</link>
		<comments>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/04/19/rape-definition-updated-in-md/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectsacramento.com/2008/04/19/rape-definition-updated-in-md/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Baltimore Sun, a recent court ruling has changed how &#8220;rape&#8221; is defined. Apparently some poor punter is going to prison for 15 years because he stopped fingering a girl 5-10 seconds after she revoked consent. This is probably one of the most outrageous perversions of our so-called justice system that I&#8217;ve heard [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/04/19/rape-definition-updated-in-md/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sperm Donors Liable for Child Support</title>
		<link>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/02/27/sperm-donors-liable-for-child-support/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=sperm-donors-liable-for-child-support</link>
		<comments>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/02/27/sperm-donors-liable-for-child-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectsacramento.com/2008/02/27/sperm-donors-liable-for-child-support/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent court ruling, sperm donors who maintain contact with their offspring are now liable for child support.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/02/27/sperm-donors-liable-for-child-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT: Taking Marriage Private</title>
		<link>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/02/27/nyt-taking-marriage-private/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=nyt-taking-marriage-private</link>
		<comments>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/02/27/nyt-taking-marriage-private/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectsacramento.com/2008/02/27/nyt-taking-marriage-private/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times asks an interesting question, &#8220;WHY do people — gay or straight — need the state’s permission to marry?&#8221; and then proceeds to examine the historical drivers for state involvement in regulating marriage and sexual behavior.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://projectsacramento.com/2008/02/27/nyt-taking-marriage-private/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
